⬈
Keywords
derechos humanos
derechos de los pueblos
justicia
genocidio
How to Cite
Plaudit
Abstract
Emerged as a reaction to the horrors of Nazism, international criminal law gradually became a legitimation tool for neo-colonialist interventions. It is in this context of changes (typical of the 21st century) in which it appears as relevant to recover the experience of the Courts of Opinion (and in particular of the Permanent Peoples Court) as a possibility of revaluing the power to judge and the need to autonomy of the people against the new offensives of the hegemonic powers.
References
Feierstein, Daniel. 2008. "El peligro del redireccionamiento de los conceptos del derecho internacional: las Naciones Unidas, la Corte Penal Internacional y el nuevo papel de los EE.UU”. Revista de Estudios sobre Genocidio 2: 83-97.
Feierstein, Daniel. 2011. "The Good, the Bad, and the Invisible: A Critical Look at the MARO Report". Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal 6(1). http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp/vol6/iss1/5
Feierstein, Daniel. 2015. Juicios. Sobre la elaboración del genocidio 2. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Jiménez de Asúa, Luis. 1950. Tratado de Derecho penal, Tomo II. Buenos Aires: Editorial Losada.
Sartre, Jean Paul. 1973. Situaciones VIII: Alrededor del 68. Buenos Aires: Losada.
Zolo, Danilo. 2007. La justicia de los vencedores. De Nuremberg a Bagdad. Buenos Aires: Edhasa.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 Daniel Feierstein