Language, Power, and Identity in Learning English: the Case of Students from the Sierra Norte de Puebla
PDF Redalyc (ES)
XML (ES)

Keywords

learning English
indigenous population
post-colonialism
critical applied linguistics

How to Cite

Despagne, C. . (2018). Language, Power, and Identity in Learning English: the Case of Students from the Sierra Norte de Puebla. Revista nuestrAmérica, 6(11). Retrieved from https://nuestramerica.cl/ojs/index.php/nuestramerica/article/view/450

Abstract

This critical ethnographic case study is based on the process of learning English as a foreign language in Mexico by indigenous and mestizo students from the Sierra Norte de Puebla. The objective of the study is, on the one hand, to identify and understand the factors that contribute to generate the challenges that these students must face when learning English, and on the other, to analyze the factors that influence the students' commitment to learn the language. The research is framed in the area of applied linguistics (critical) and postcolonial theories to understand the socio-historical context in which students are placed when learning English, and to question power relations and inequalities between languages and cultures in Mexico.

PDF Redalyc (ES)
XML (ES)

References

Benson, Phil. 1997. The philosophy and politics of learner autonomy. En Autonomy and independence in language learning, eds. Phil Benson y Peter Voller, 18–34. Harlow, England: Pearson Education.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 2001. Langage et pouvoir symbolique. France: Essais Points.

Candelier, Michel (coord.). 2012. A framework of reference for pluralistic approaches to languages and culture (FREPA). Graz, Austria: European Center for Modern Languages / Council of Europe Publishing.

Carrillo Trueba, César. 2009. El racismo en México: Una visión sintética. México: CONACULTA.

Castro-Gómez, Santiago. 2008. (Post)coloniality for dummies: Latin American perspectives on modernity, coloniality, and the geopolitics of knowledge. En Coloniality at large: Latin America and the post-colonial debate, eds. Mabel Mabel, Enrique Dussel y Carlos A. Jaúregui, 259–285. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Chamot, Anna Uhl y O’Malley J. Michael. 1994. The CALLA handbook: How to implement the cognitive academic language learning approach. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Cook, Vivian. 1992. “Evidence for multi-competence”. Language Learning, 42(4): 557–591.

Coste, Daniel y Simon, Diana-Lee. 2009. The plurilingual social actor. Language, citizenship and education. International Journal of Multilingualism, 6(2), 168–185.

Denzin, Norman K. 2005. Emancipatory discourses and the ethics and politics of interpretation. En The Sage handbook of qualitative research, eds. Norman K. Denzin y Yvonna S. Lincoln, 933–958. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.

Denzin, Norman K. y Lincoln, Yvonna S. 2005. The discipline and practice of qualitative research. En The Sage handbook of qualitative research, eds. Norman K. Denzin y Yvonna S. Lincoln, 1–32. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.

Despagne, Colette. 2010. The difficulties of learning English: Perceptions and attitudes in Mexico. Canadian and International Education. Education Canadienne et Internationale, 39(2): 55–74.

Despagne, Colette. 2013. An Investigation into identity, power and autonomous EFL learning by Indigenous and minority students in post-secondary education: A Mexican case study. Tesis de doctorado, Western University.

Despagne, Colette. 2015. Autonomous pluralistic learning strategies among Mexican Indigenous and Minority University Students learning English. Canadian Modern Language Review 71(noviembre): 362-382.

Dodson, Lisa, Deborah Piatelli y Leah Schmalzbauer. 2007. “Researching inequality through interpretive collaborations: Shifting power and the unspoken contract”. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(6): 821–843.

Escobar, Arturo. 2005. Más allá del tercer mundo: Globalización y diferencia. Bogotá: Instituto Colombiano de Antropología e Historia.

García, Ofelia y Claire E. Sylvan. 2011. Pedagogies and practices in multilingual classrooms: Singularities in pluralities. Modern Language Journal, 95(3): 385–400.

Gómez Izquierdo, Jorge y María Eugenia Sánchez Díaz de Rivera. 2011. La ideología mestizante, el guadalupanismo y sus repercusiones sociales: Una revisión crítica de la identidad. Puebla, México: Lupus Inquisitor.

Hall, Stuart. 1996. Who needs identity? En Questions of cultural identity, eds. Stuart Hall y Paul du Gay, 1–17. London, England: Sage. Holec, Henri. 1981. Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford, England: Pergamon.

Little, David. 2007. “Language learner autonomy: Some fundamental considerations revisited”. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1): 14–29.

Mignolo, Walter D. 2000. Local histories / global designs: Coloniality, subaltern knowledges, and border thinking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.

Mignolo, Walter D. 2005. La idea de América Latina: La herida colonial y la opción decolonial. Barcelona: Gedisa.

Mignolo, Walter. 2008. The geopolitics of knowledge and the colonial difference. En Coloniality at large: Latin America and the post-colonial debate, eds. Mabel Mabel, Enrique Dussel y Carlos A. Jaúregui, 225–258. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Norton, Bonny. 2001. Non-participation, imagined communities, and the language classroom. In Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research, ed. Michael Breen, 159–171. London: Longman-Pearson Education.

Norton Peirce, Bonny. 1995. “Social identity, investment, and language learning”. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1): 9–32.

Norton, Bonny y Toohey, Kelleen. 2004 (Eds.). Critical pedagogies and language learning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Norton, B., & Toohey, Kelleen. 2011. “Identity, language learning, and social change”. Language Teaching, 44(4): 412–446.

Oxford, Rebecca L. 2003. Toward a more systematic model of L2 learner autonomy. En Learner autonomy across cultures: Language Education Perspectives, eds. David Palfreyman & Richard Smith, 75–91. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Pennycook, Alastair. 2001. Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Ribé, Ramón. 2003. Tramas in the foreign language classroom: Autopoietic networks for learner growth. En Learner autonomy in the foreign language classroom: Teacher, learner, curriculum and assessment, eds. David Little, Jennifer Ridley y Ema Ushioda, 11–28. Dublin, Ireland: Authentik.

Sayer, Peter. 2007. Legitimate speakers? An ethnographic study of Oaxacan EFL teachers’ ideologies about English. Tesis de doctorado, Universidad Estatal de Arizona.

Schmelkes, Sylvia. 2006. “La interculturalidad en la educación básica”. Revista PRELAC 3: 120–127.

Smith, Linda Tuhiwai. 1999. Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples. London, England: Zed Books.

Stake, Robert. 2005. Qualitative case studies. En The Sage handbook of qualitative research, eds. Norman K. Denzin y Yvonna S. Lincoln, 443–466. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Toohey, Kelleen, & Norton, Bonny. 2003. Learner autonomy as agency in sociocultural settings. En Learner autonomy across cultures: Language Education Perspectives, eds. David Palfreyman & Richard Smith, 58–72. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.

Wenden, Anita. 1991. Learner strategies for learner autonomy: Planning and implementing learner training for language learners. Hampstead, UK: Prentice Hall International.

Yin, Robert K. 2006. Case study methods. En The handbook of complementary methods in education research, eds. Judith Green, Gregory Camilli y Patricia Elmore, 111–122. London, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2018 Colette Despagne

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.